The effect of collaborative knowledge modeling at a distance on performance and on learning [r-libre/2314]

Basque, Josianne et Pudelko, Béatrice (2004). The effect of collaborative knowledge modeling at a distance on performance and on learning. Dans Cañas, Alberto J.; Novak, Joseph D. et González, Fermin (dir.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, vol. 1 (p. 67-74). Pamplona, Spain : Universidad Pública de Navarra.

Fichier(s) associé(s) à ce document :

PDF - Basque et Pudelko 2014_The effects of collaborative knowledge modeling.pdf
Contenu du fichier : Version de l'éditeur

Télécharger

Catégorie de document :	Communications dans des actes de congrès/colloques
Évaluation par un comité de lecture :	Oui
Étape de publication :	Publié
Résumé :	This study examines the effect of co-elaborating a knowledge model in dyads at a distance on performance and on learning. Participants (N = 48) were trained to represent knowledge taken from a text, using an object-typed knowledge modeling editor software tool. Knowledge modeling is similar to concept mapping, except that the former is based on a typology of knowledge objects and a typology of links, and that the structure of the knowledge representation is not necessarily hierarchical. After a 75-minute training session to knowledge modeling, each participant constructed a knowledge model individually. The experimental session consisted of elaborating a knowledge model in dyads. In the first condition, participants constructed and shared the knowledge model at a distance, using a whiteboard and a chat tool (synchronous group). In the second condition, participants elaborated one knowledge model with a turn-taking approach; they used e-mail to share their work-in-progress (asynchronous group). In the third condition, participants worked face-to-face at the same computer (control group). Pre- and post-tests were administered to measure learning in the domain. Results show that the quality of the knowledge models was better for dyads in the face-to-face condition than for the ones in the asynchronous condition, but only for the score related to knowledge objects (and not for the score related to propositions). We did not find a significant between-group difference on learning, but results indicate a tendency that working at a distance in a synchronous mode was more beneficial than working face-to-face and synchronously at a distance. These results should be interpreted with caution considering the short duration of the experiment and the low familiarity of participants with the targeted domain and with knowledge modeling.
Adresse de la version officielle :	https://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc-proceedings/
Déposant:	Basque, Josianne
Responsable :	Josianne Basque
Dépôt :	20 mai 2021 15:06
Dernière modification :	20 mai 2021 15:06

Actions (connexion requise)

RÉVISER